Backgammon Bear Photo The Backgammon Bear Sherlock Holmes
Backgammon
in Austin
Analysis
Blunders
Problems
Links
About the
bear
Mail the
bear
Home >>> Analysis >>> 05/08/2006 2 previous next
Dave (Green) vs. John (White)

Money session. Score Green-White: 0-0





 
Pip: 105
Game 1
Money session

Green-White:
Score 0-0
Pip: 81
 

# Ply Move Equity
  1 M 6/1* 3/1 0,864
    0,8%  36,7%  79,8%    20,2%   3,0%   0,1%
    Live cube rollout: 0,860
  2 M 9/4 6/4 0,702 (-0,162)
    0,7%  24,7%  78,0%    22,0%   2,9%   0,1%
    Live cube rollout: 0,710
  3 1 10/5 3/1* 0,501 (-0,363)
    0,5%  24,5%  71,2%    28,8%   6,6%   0,1%
  4 1 10/8 6/1* 0,444 (-0,420)
    0,6%  25,1%  69,4%    30,6%   8,9%   0,2%
  5 1 9/7 6/1* 0,421 (-0,443)
    0,5%  25,1%  68,9%    31,1%   9,8%   0,2%

Cube action
Playing 9/4, 6/4 was certainly out of character for John. Not sure, why he chose this play. It seems clear there must be a significant difference in gammons, even if the winning percentage is close.


This file has been generated by Snowie Professional Edition Version 4.5, a product of SnowieGroup SA
Output date: 22:28:22, 09.05.2006(Export v2.10)