|
|
|
||||||
|
in Austin |
|
|
|
|
bear |
bear |
||
| Home >>> Analysis >>> 05/02/2005 5 | previous | next | ||||||
|
John (Green) vs. Marc (White) Money Game Session |
![]() |
Game 01 |
![]() |


| Move 1 Green |
|
|
| Pip: 100 | ||
| Game 1 Money session Green-White: Score 0-0 | ||
| Pip: 66 | ||
| # | Ply | Move | Equity | |
| * | 1 | 3 | 6/1 6/2 | 0,142 |
| 0,0% 2,2% 63,9% 36,1% 2,7% 0,0% | ||||
| 2 | 3 | 9/4 5/1 | -0,144 (-0,286) | |
| 0,1% 3,4% 53,2% 46,8% 6,8% 0,1% | ||||
| 3 | 1 | 9/5 6/1 | -0,329 (-0,471) | |
| 0,0% 2,9% 45,5% 54,5% 6,9% 0,0% | ||||
| 4 | 1 | 6/1 5/1 | -0,427 (-0,569) | |
| 0,0% 2,5% 42,6% 57,4% 9,4% 0,0% | ||||
| 5 | 1 | 9/4 9/5 | -0,645 (-0,787) | |
| 0,0% 3,3% 36,8% 63,2% 18,2% 0,0% | ||||
| Move 1 White |
|
|
| Pip: 100 | ||
| Game 1 Money session Green-White: Score 0-0 | ||
| Pip: 57 | ||
| # | Ply | Move | Equity | |
| * | 1 | M | 8/2 7/4 | -0,158 |
| 0,1% 3,6% 35,2% 64,8% 1,8% 0,0% | ||||
| Live cube rollout: -0,181 | ||||
| 2 | M | 22/13 | -0,190 (-0,032) | |
| 0,1% 4,6% 33,7% 66,3% 1,5% 0,0% | ||||
| Live cube rollout: -0,228 | ||||
| 3 | 3 | 8/5 7/1 | -0,255 (-0,097) | |
| 0,0% 1,5% 32,0% 68,0% 2,5% 0,0% | ||||
| 4 | 3 | 8/2 6/3 | -0,266 (-0,108) | |
| 0,0% 1,3% 31,8% 68,2% 3,1% 0,0% | ||||
| 5 | 3 | 7/1 5/2 | -0,271 (-0,113) | |
| 0,0% 1,3% 31,5% 68,5% 2,9% 0,0% | ||||
| Checker play |
|
Good choice, although 22/13 is almost as good. |
| Move 2 Green |
|
|
| Pip: 91 | ||
| Game 1 Money session Green-White: Score 0-0 | ||
| Pip: 57 | ||
| # | Ply | Move | Equity | |
| 1 | M | 9/4 | -0,082 | |
| 0,0% 1,4% 54,4% 45,6% 3,8% 0,1% | ||||
| Live cube rollout: -0,072 | ||||
| * | 2 | M | 9/7 5/2 | -0,246 (-0,164) |
| 0,0% 1,1% 47,3% 52,7% 4,9% 0,1% | ||||
| Live cube rollout: -0,230 | ||||
| 3 | 1 | 9/6 9/7 | -1,000 (-0,918) | |
| 0,0% 1,6% 21,3% 78,7% 20,9% 0,0% | ||||
| Blunder (0,157) |
| Checker play |
|
This is not quite optimal though.I am not quite sure, what the reason was for this play. The best play looks quite natural. |