in Austin
bear
bear
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
in Austin |
|
|
|
|
bear |
bear |
||
| Home >>> Analysis >>> 01/10/2005 9 | previous | next | ||||||
|
Marc (Green) vs. Dave (White) |
|
|
||
| Pip: 53 | ||
| Game 1 Money session Green-White: Score 0-0 | ||
| Pip: 129 | ||
| # | Ply | Move | Equity | |
| 1 | M | 24/18(2) 23/17 12/6 | -0,558 | |
| Live cube rollout: -0,552 | ||||
| 2 | M | 24/18 17/5 12/6 | -0,622 (-0,064) | |
| Live cube rollout: -0,614 | ||||
| 3 | M | 24/12 12/6(2) | -0,628 (-0,070) | |
| Live cube rollout: -0,620 | ||||
| 4 | M | 23/5 12/6 | -0,638 (-0,080) | |
| Live cube rollout: -0,634 | ||||
| 5 | M | 24/6 23/17 | -0,672 (-0,114) | |
| Live cube rollout: -0,671 | ||||
| Cube action |
|
This is the last recorded scene from the drama: Interestingly it seems best to come out with all of the back guys (after making the 5-point). White can jump the Green checkers with a 10 or higher (6 rolls). He will have to leave double shot with any 5 or 6, that do not jump and double 4s (15 numbers). He can stay back with 15 other rolls. Green will have a double indirect, but it is hard to assess the chances. As I find it very difficult to judge the various plays in this position at the table. Marc tried 23/5, 12/6, which looks reasonable to me, but is inferior. The final stage of this memorable game unfolded after Dave was able to bear in most of his checkers and finally dlearing 3 checkers on his 2-point with a double 2, winning a backgammon and 95 points (16*3*2 - 1, which he had dropped early on). I do not think one person should have that much luck (unless it is me). |
