in Austin
bear
bear
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
in Austin |
|
|
|
|
bear |
bear |
||
| Home >>> Analysis >>> 01/10/2005 4 | previous | next | ||||||
|
Wolfram (Green) vs. Dave (White) |
|
|
||
| Pip: 92 | ||
| Game 1 Money session Green-White: Score 0-0 | ||
| Pip: 70 | ||
| # | Ply | Move | Equity | |
| 1 | M | 9/1 8/4(2) | 0,566 | |
| Live cube rollout: 0,558 | ||||
| 2 | M | 15/7 9/1 | 0,451 (-0,114) | |
| Live cube rollout: 0,420 | ||||
| 3 | M | 15/11 9/5 8/4(2) | 0,365 (-0,200) | |
| Live cube rollout: 0,368 | ||||
| 4 | 2 | 15/11 9/1 8/4 | 0,139 (-0,427) | |
| 5 | 2 | 9/1 6/2(2) | 0,124 (-0,442) | |
| Cube action |
|
I have to admit, I never seriously considered the best play! My decision was between #2 and #3 and I decided to go for #3, even though it leaves more hits, because I thought it would be the easiest to clean up. That may very well be, but it seems I should have worried more about what happens, if I get hit. If I bring all other men in, I will be in reasonable shape, even if hit, unless White brings all checkers around without me entering or closes his board. Also notice how skillfully I raised the gammon chances - especially my opponent's! |
