House Criminal Jurisprudence Chairman Files ACLU Bills to Remedy “Tulia” Injustices
The following is excerpted from the 2-28-01 Lubbock Avalanche Journal
Rep. Hinojosa signs on as sponsor of ACLU's 'Tulia
Proposals'
By DEON DAUGHERTY
Morris News Service
AUSTIN - State Rep. Juan Hinojosa, D-McAllen, is planning to
file legislation to ensure that an "injustice" similar to a
controversial 1999 drug bust in Tulia doesn't happen again, he said. The lawmaker
said Tuesday he will sponsor the "Tulia Proposals," a series of measures
drafted by the Texas chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. The
legislation was designed in response to an investigation that led to the arrest
of about 10 percent of Tulia's black residents for drug crimes based solely on
the testimony of undercover officer Tom Coleman.
Charges against one of the defendants have been dismissed, and Coleman's work
is now under investigation by the U.S. Justice Department.
"I feel we need to find ways to correct those types of
situations," Hinojosa said. "It's a responsibility of the Legislature
to investigate. ... It is unacceptable, what happened in Tulia."
The measures suggest:
Will Harrell, executive director of the Texas ACLU group,
said Hinojosa's position as a respected lawmaker and chairman of the House
Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence makes him a solid sponsor of the measures. The
measures are vital, Harrell said, because ACLU members don't believe the Tulia
incident is an aberration.
"We think 'Tulia' is a commonality. The only difference
is they got caught," he said of allegations of law enforcement wrongdoing.
Prosecutors and law enforcement authorities in Swisher
County deny any wrongdoing in the case and insist that the arrests and
prosecutions were legitimate. Harrell also said at least six other cases in
Texas would be addressed by the proposed legislation.
Hinojosa said the Tulia case, in which evidence that could
have harmed Coleman's credibility was not allowed, illustrates an abuse of the
law, and something needs to be done to prevent it from happening again.
Most urban parts of the state require corroborating evidence
when only one agent testifies, Hinojosa said.
Matt Powell, first assistant with the Lubbock County
Criminal District Attorney's Office, said decisions of how much evidence is
needed is handled on a case-by-case basis.
"One of the reasons is, very simply sometimes those
guys are going to put their lives in jeopardy" if they are found with a
wire or other recording device, he said.
"Ultimately, a jury has to decide if they believe
someone beyond a reasonable doubt, and the law allows them to, based on the
testimony of one witness."